I've driven a standard M2 and thought that was incredible so this thing must be insane.
Few YouTube clips suggest it sounds good too!
Traction, traction, traction.moulin12 said:A surprise for me though is that a detuned the S55 is returning 0-60 figures the same as the N55 M2, and just 0.2 sec faster than a m240i, though of course it's the engine characteristics that matter just as much, and I appreciate that they have to leave some room for when they want to give the sales a boost next time round.Manc M135i said:I fully respect that, my point being that many here seem very quick to talk it down. Yet this has the makings to be one of the best coupes BMW have ever produced.Deadeye said:If you say so.
Let's see how it drives after jumping straight out of our current M2s.
Not having been jollied over to Spain having not driven the original (not LCI) for 2 years.
Don't like the wheels, it's gonna sound crap, I don't need more power, new seats are too big, don't like the new grill, doesn't look as agressive as the current M2, the carbon strut brace looks like a toilet... And so on!
Not trolling just a stark observation having read the last 3 pages.
Makes me laugh so much when M-Lite owners say there's no difference between them and an M2.DaleB90 said:The only negatives of the M2C for me are the new front grilles and the optional wheels. Spec the original 19's and the grilles would be something I'd get used too. I prefer the n55 sound over the s55 but it still sounds good and a much more tuneable engine.
The current M2 is neck and neck in a straight line with the 240 which obviously makes the 240 owners question the purpose of the regular M2. Those that judge the M2 like this are probably only interested in straight lines and motorway blasts however.
It will be interesting to see what the finance deals are like in a few years time on the M2C. Most likely a repeat of the current pre reg deals we were all treated too.
Where have you seen this?napes5 said:Makes me laugh so much when M-Lite owners say there's no difference between them and an M2.DaleB90 said:The only negatives of the M2C for me are the new front grilles and the optional wheels. Spec the original 19's and the grilles would be something I'd get used too. I prefer the n55 sound over the s55 but it still sounds good and a much more tuneable engine.
The current M2 is neck and neck in a straight line with the 240 which obviously makes the 240 owners question the purpose of the regular M2. Those that judge the M2 like this are probably only interested in straight lines and motorway blasts however.
It will be interesting to see what the finance deals are like in a few years time on the M2C. Most likely a repeat of the current pre reg deals we were all treated too.![]()
Many times on this forum!moulin12 said:Where have you seen this?napes5 said:Makes me laugh so much when M-Lite owners say there's no difference between them and an M2.DaleB90 said:The only negatives of the M2C for me are the new front grilles and the optional wheels. Spec the original 19's and the grilles would be something I'd get used too. I prefer the n55 sound over the s55 but it still sounds good and a much more tuneable engine.
The current M2 is neck and neck in a straight line with the 240 which obviously makes the 240 owners question the purpose of the regular M2. Those that judge the M2 like this are probably only interested in straight lines and motorway blasts however.
It will be interesting to see what the finance deals are like in a few years time on the M2C. Most likely a repeat of the current pre reg deals we were all treated too.![]()
If engine or exhaust note is of any interest to you, the F80 M3 or new M2 Comp WILL disappoint on that front!Ursy said:I still want an M2 ... though just got into my M3 E92 to move it back on the drive - and the sound of that engine really does make me question selling up to get an M2!
Do like the M2C though, and speaking to a guy tomorrow re one as apparently we get corporate discounts on them. Will def spec the original alloys though, always hated the comp alloys on the M3/4's previously.
130 engine? Really? I remember test driving one of those years ago and thought it was gutless - no turbo - no power. What's good about it?swanny71 said:Always makes me cringe when forum members waffle on about 'proper M' engines.
If BMW see fit put an engine in an M car then it's an M engine. Full stop.
Personally I think my 130i has a nicer engine than the M2 but I'd never argue the M2's N55 isn't a proper M engine.
It's not all about power mate - that N52 is smooth, sweet revving, bags of torque, sounds fantastic and the throttle response knocks all BMW turbo motors I've driven for six.napes5 said:130 engine? Really? I remember test driving one of those years ago and thought it was gutless - no turbo - no power. What's good about it?swanny71 said:Always makes me cringe when forum members waffle on about 'proper M' engines.
If BMW see fit put an engine in an M car then it's an M engine. Full stop.
Personally I think my 130i has a nicer engine than the M2 but I'd never argue the M2's N55 isn't a proper M engine.
That's fine, not arguing, just interesting what motor characteristics people are drawn to.swanny71 said:It's not all about power mate - that N52 is smooth, sweet revving, bags of torque, sounds fantastic and the throttle response knocks all BMW turbo motors I've driven for six.napes5 said:130 engine? Really? I remember test driving one of those years ago and thought it was gutless - no turbo - no power. What's good about it?swanny71 said:Always makes me cringe when forum members waffle on about 'proper M' engines.
If BMW see fit put an engine in an M car then it's an M engine. Full stop.
Personally I think my 130i has a nicer engine than the M2 but I'd never argue the M2's N55 isn't a proper M engine.
It's my opinion, you're entitled to yours so I'm not gonna argue with you,
Nice!Ursy said:Been speaking to a contact at BMW HQ this morning, been offered a pretty good deal i think.
List: ÂŁ51,800 inc options
OTR: ÂŁ44,509 price
Saving ÂŁ7,300
Now even more tempted!!
Okay, though tbh I'm not sure I've seen any. Seen plenty of posts arguing the merits of 240 vs M2 in terms of cost, daily driver and that sort of thing, but that's something different?napes5 said:Many times on this forum!moulin12 said:Where have you seen this?napes5 said:Makes me laugh so much when M-Lite owners say there's no difference between them and an M2.![]()
I agree with you, sweet engine, great noise before all the fake in cabin crap we have now. We (Mrs Deadeye) had a 130i for 10 years then I gave her my M135i.swanny71 said:It's not all about power mate - that N52 is smooth, sweet revving, bags of torque, sounds fantastic and the throttle response knocks all BMW turbo motors I've driven for six.napes5 said:130 engine? Really? I remember test driving one of those years ago and thought it was gutless - no turbo - no power. What's good about it?swanny71 said:Always makes me cringe when forum members waffle on about 'proper M' engines.
If BMW see fit put an engine in an M car then it's an M engine. Full stop.
Personally I think my 130i has a nicer engine than the M2 but I'd never argue the M2's N55 isn't a proper M engine.
It's my opinion, you're entitled to yours so I'm not gonna argue with you,
It's a great deal so if u can afford it, go for it dude!Ursy said:Sadly its a staff offer![]()