My 120d has just arrived. I'd had a short test drive, but I had 48hrs in a 320d before making a decision. Now I'm puzzled. The 3 series seems universally feted as the best executive car, whereas the 1 series gets 'OK' reviews. Based on that, and my brief experience, I was quite prepared for the 120d to be 'worse' than the 3 series I tried. After all I was saving a fair bit of money. But it isn't...
I find the two cars very similar in character. The smaller car is a bit more 'go-kart' like, the bigger car a little more refined. But there's very little in it, certainly not to warrant the received wisdom on the cars. I'd have been very happy with the 3, but think I made the right call.
So why are the press so lukewarm? Any bright ideas?
I find the two cars very similar in character. The smaller car is a bit more 'go-kart' like, the bigger car a little more refined. But there's very little in it, certainly not to warrant the received wisdom on the cars. I'd have been very happy with the 3, but think I made the right call.
So why are the press so lukewarm? Any bright ideas?